Automating Android Dynamic Analysis with Objection CLI
- THE MAG POST
- Aug 19
- 6 min read
Automating Android dynamic analysis with Objection CLI can be challenging when integrating it into Python scripts. The core issue is that the Objection CLI command tends to freeze the script's execution, preventing subsequent code from running smoothly. This article addresses this problem by exploring strategies to handle this blocking behavior, enabling automated dynamic analysis workflows. By finding a way to execute Objection in a non-blocking manner, we can seamlessly integrate it into automated testing pipelines. This ensures that Objection runs concurrently with other processes, such as MonkeyRunner.
To effectively automate dynamic analysis, it's essential to find a method that permits Objection CLI to run concurrently with other processes, such as MonkeyRunner. This concurrency ensures that the application's behavior can be monitored in real-time while automated actions are performed. The solution should enable the script to initiate Objection, execute MonkeyRunner commands, and collect the analysis results without manual intervention. By redirecting the output to a file, the results of the Objection CLI analysis can be captured and analyzed later.
This article addresses the challenge of automating dynamic analysis of Android applications using Objection CLI in Python scripts. The core issue arises when the Objection CLI command freezes the script's execution, preventing subsequent code from running. We will explore strategies to handle this blocking behavior, enabling automated dynamic analysis workflows. The goal is to integrate Objection CLI seamlessly into automated testing pipelines.
Understanding the Objection CLI Freezing Issue
The primary problem is that the Objection CLI command, when executed via subprocess.run or similar methods, halts the script’s progress. This occurs because Objection enters an interactive mode, awaiting further instructions, which conflicts with the need for automated script execution. The desired behavior involves initiating Objection and then programmatically driving the analysis, for instance, by generating activity using MonkeyRunner.
Initial Attempts and Challenges
Various approaches, including subprocess.run, popen, and threading, have been attempted to circumvent the freezing issue. However, each method yields the same result: the script pauses at the Objection command, awaiting manual input. This behavior obstructs the automated generation of activity via MonkeyRunner, which should occur while Objection is actively monitoring the application. Therefore, a non-blocking execution of the Objection CLI is essential for seamless automation.
The challenge lies in decoupling the Objection process from the main script's execution flow. Ideally, Objection should run in the background, allowing the script to continue executing subsequent commands, such as those that trigger MonkeyRunner to generate application activity. This requires a solution that allows Objection to operate independently without blocking the primary script.
To effectively automate dynamic analysis, it's crucial to find a method that permits Objection CLI to run concurrently with other processes, such as MonkeyRunner. This concurrency ensures that the application's behavior can be monitored in real-time while automated actions are performed. The solution should enable the script to initiate Objection, execute MonkeyRunner commands, and collect the analysis results without manual intervention.
Implementing Non-Blocking Execution withsubprocess.Popen
To address the freezing issue, subprocess.Popen can be employed to run Objection CLI in a non-blocking manner. By redirecting the output to a file, the script can continue its execution without waiting for Objection to complete. This approach allows for concurrent execution of Objection and MonkeyRunner, enabling automated dynamic analysis.
Backgrounding Objection withsubprocess.Popen
Using subprocess.Popen, the Objection command can be executed in the background, allowing the script to proceed without interruption. The output is redirected to a file for later analysis. This ensures that Objection runs independently, monitoring the application while the script continues to generate activity using MonkeyRunner.
The key to this solution is the non-blocking nature of subprocess.Popen. Unlike subprocess.run, which waits for the command to complete, subprocess.Popen starts the process and immediately returns control to the script. This allows the script to execute subsequent commands concurrently with the Objection process, enabling seamless automation.
By redirecting the output to a file, the results of the Objection CLI analysis can be captured and analyzed later. This ensures that no data is lost and that the analysis can be performed offline. The file can be processed to extract relevant information, such as hooked method calls, arguments, and return values.
Integrating MonkeyRunner for Automated Activity Generation
With Objection running in the background, MonkeyRunner can be used to generate automated activity within the Android application. This involves creating a MonkeyRunner script that simulates user interactions, such as button presses and screen taps. These interactions trigger the methods being monitored by Objection, providing valuable insights into the application's behavior.
Creating a MonkeyRunner Script
A MonkeyRunner script can be created to automate user interactions with the Android application. This script simulates button presses, screen taps, and other actions to trigger the methods being monitored by Objection CLI. The script can be designed to explore different parts of the application and generate a variety of inputs.
The MonkeyRunner script should be tailored to the specific application being analyzed. It should focus on triggering the methods that are being hooked by Objection, ensuring that the analysis captures relevant data. The script can be designed to run for a specified duration or until a certain number of events have been generated.
By combining MonkeyRunner with Objection, a comprehensive dynamic analysis can be performed. MonkeyRunner generates the activity, while Objection monitors the application's behavior in real-time. The results can be analyzed to identify potential security vulnerabilities or performance issues. This approach provides a powerful tool for automated testing and analysis of Android applications.
Converting and Parsing Objection Reports
The raw output from Objection CLI can be converted into a more structured format for easier analysis. This involves parsing the output file and extracting relevant information, such as method calls, arguments, and return values. The converted data can then be used to generate reports or identify potential issues.
Parsing the Objection Output
The output from Objection is parsed to extract relevant information, such as the method being called, the arguments passed to the method, and the return value. This information is then stored in a structured format, such as a CSV file, for easier analysis. The parsing process involves identifying specific patterns in the output and extracting the corresponding data.
The converted data can be used to generate reports that summarize the application's behavior. These reports can include information such as the frequency of method calls, the values of arguments passed to methods, and the return values of methods. This information can be used to identify potential security vulnerabilities or performance issues.
By converting and parsing the Objection output, the data becomes more accessible and easier to analyze. This allows for a more thorough understanding of the application's behavior and facilitates the identification of potential issues. The structured data can also be used to create visualizations that provide insights into the application's dynamics.
Final Solution: Concurrent Execution of Objection and MonkeyRunner
The final solution involves using subprocess.Popen to run Objection CLI in the background, redirecting the output to a file. Simultaneously, MonkeyRunner is used to generate automated activity within the Android application. The Objection output is then converted and parsed to extract relevant information, providing a comprehensive dynamic analysis of the application.
The key components of this solution are the non-blocking execution of Objection, the automated activity generation with MonkeyRunner, and the structured analysis of the Objection output. By combining these elements, a fully automated dynamic analysis workflow can be achieved. This workflow can be integrated into continuous integration systems for automated testing and analysis of Android applications.
Similar Problems (with 1–2 line solutions)
Below are five related tasks leveraging similar methodologies.
Automating Frida Scripts
Use subprocess.Popen to run Frida scripts in the background, allowing for concurrent execution with other processes.
Dynamic Analysis of iOS Applications
Adapt the Objection workflow to iOS applications using Frida and UI Automation for activity generation.
Automated Penetration Testing
Integrate dynamic analysis with automated penetration testing tools to identify security vulnerabilities.
Performance Profiling
Use dynamic analysis to profile the performance of Android applications, identifying bottlenecks and areas for optimization.
Malware Analysis
Apply dynamic analysis techniques to analyze the behavior of Android malware, identifying malicious activities and potential threats.
Additional Code Illustrations (Related to the Main Program)
Each illustration shows a focused variant or extension, followed by a brief explanation. All code is placed outside HTML tags as required.
Modifiedrun_objectionFunction withPopen
This code illustrates the use of subprocess.Popen to run the Objection CLI command in a non-blocking manner, redirecting both standard output and standard error to a file.
Example MonkeyRunner Script
This MonkeyRunner script automates basic interactions with an Android application, such as launching the application, simulating touches, and typing text. These actions can trigger methods being monitored by Objection CLI.
Report Conversion Script
This Python script converts the raw Objection CLI output into a structured format, extracting timestamps, class names, method names, and arguments for easier analysis.
Technique | Description | Benefit |
subprocess.Popen | Runs Objection CLI in the background. | Allows concurrent execution with MonkeyRunner. |
MonkeyRunner | Generates automated activity within the Android application. | Triggers methods being monitored by Objection. |
Report Conversion | Parses and structures the output from Objection. | Facilitates easier analysis of the application's behavior. |
Comments